Although there is broad consensus that more inclusive approaches are needed in climate adaptation planning, it is unclear how cities should redesign rules, institutions, and decision-making processes to produce more equitable forms of participation and engagement. This paper evaluates different planning procedures and institutional arrangements across twenty-five U.S. cities. Although arrangements are context-specific, institutional designs fall into three categories: consultative partnerships, strategic collaborations, and expansive co-governance arrangements. Each institutional design leads to different kinds of inclusion outcomes. Our results empiricize how cities can pursue more inclusive climate adaptation planning and highlight opportunities to advance and implement broader procedural equity goals.

• Cannon, C. E., Chu, E. K., Natekal, A., & Waaland, G. (2024). Institutional Designs for Procedural Justice and Inclusion in Urban Climate Change Adaptation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 0739456X241274579. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0739456X241274579